Shop IisecShop.com

homeproductsservicessupportabout us

Republican National Committee /Cato Heritage Foundation Family Values On Display

July 30th, 2007

Posted 7/30/07 2:00 PM

George Walker Bush Continues The RNC /Cato/Heritage Alliance’s Destruction of Poor Families .

*******

By Kenneth B. Jackson Jr.



The RNC /Cato/Heritage Alliance War on The Poor


From the 2001 Tax Cut (1) and the associated stealth tax increase for the Poor to the expression of George Walker Bush’s hatred for the Poor AMERICAN family which is made plain by the most recent actions of the RNC /Cato/Heritage Alliance’s attempts to derail the expansion of SCHIP to cover more AMERICAN children.

One of the earliest of the RNC /Cato/Heritage alliance’s assaults on the Poor AMERICAN family was the 2001 Tax Cut (1) as depicted in the Fig. Below.


The RNC’s 2001 Tax Increase for The Poor

Individual tax liability

gonzo

The minimum wage is stuck at $5.15/hr. The minimum wage earner has lost $54.00 per week in buying power since 1997. The RNC is raising their taxes.


On the tax situation the RNC /Cato/Heritage has more “good news” for the The F.O.G. Elite Bush is planning to make the 2001 Tax Cut (1)permanent along with others The RNC /Cato/Heritage Alliance pushed through congress. These tax cuts will cost Americans dearly.



Cost of the BUSH tax Cuts per Person

From the Children’s Defense Fund





Now that Bush and the RNC /Cato/Heritage Alliance have increased the tax liability of the Poor and middle class taxpayers why not load them up with PORK for the The F.O.G. Elite and the F.O.G. ( FRIENDS OF GEORGE ).

Here is where the Estate tax comes into the mix



PORK for the The F.O.G. Elite .





“Dishing The PORK


All in all George Walker Bush has done a very good job of delivering the PORK to The F.O.G. Elite and the F.O.G. ( FRIENDS OF GEORGE ) The PORK is paid for by the growing number of Poor and their increased tax liability which can be seen in the increase in the percentage and the number of people in Poverty The Bush Administration’s/Cato/Heritage anti- Poor family stance has been ever present in all legislative actions and policy renderings from the SADISTIC NE-CON EVANGELICAL ACTIVIST Think Tanks.



Census Bureau Poverty Data 1959 to 2004


Now by age group


The goal has been and is to force the lower 4 quintiles (of tax liability groups ) to dish PORK to the top quintile. This illicit transfer of wealth has been the way that the RNC /Cato/Heritage Alliance has chosen to facilitate the Rape and Pillaging of the United States of America.


The stealth redistribution of the tax burden by the 2001 Tax Cut (1) was true genius in SPIN control. Two Thousand AMERICANS paid with their lives and what little property they had for the 2001 Tax Cut (1) .

Half a Million people were displaced (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) to create a new RNC controlled US Senate and US House of Representatives seats that will be SAFE GOP seats because of the removal of all the Poor Democrats from the Louisiana landscape.

Hundreds of thousands of Poor AMERICAN families were condemned to refugee status by George Walker Bush’s inaction when he was informed by asst. secretary Brown on the 27 th of Aug, 2005 that hurricane Katrina was going to hit the New Orleans area with mag 3 to 4 winds. All Bush had to do was nothing and wwoooossSHHH!!! Tom Delay’s goal of more safe Republican seats would be satisfied.. George Walker Bush new and understood the levee situation in New Orleans (11) (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Every one else in New Orleans knew that there were many places where a person could see through the flood walls. Gov. Kathleen Blanco Lead a delegation to the White House to bring the problems of the New Orleans levee system to the Bush Administration As a result of her efforts Bush cut SELA funding again that year. When high tide produces street flooding around the levees most people would understand that a magnitude 3 to 4 hurricane would be big trouble for the people living near the levees .

The resident hypocrisy and perversion that underpins the policies of the RNC /Cato/Heritage Alliance’s treatment of the AMERICAN middle class and Poor families is horrifying. The ambivalence bordering on out and out hate leads one to wonder how much does the Bush Administration think a Poor AMERICAN family is worth ??? Is a Poor AMERICAN family worth the food stamps to keep them alive ??? How much does the RNC /Cato/Heritage Alliance think Poor AMERICANS and their children are worth??




Data from IDEAS at repec@repec.org

Full report at http://www.unicef-icdc.org/publications/pdf/repcard6e.pdf



The chart above says that a Poor AMERICAN family is meaningless to the RNC /Cato/Heritage Alliance.

By Kenneth B Jackson Jr

Negroponte The Spin Buster Thanks For The Truth

July 28th, 2007

Posted 7/27/07 6:04 AM

The Perjurer General has Reached
Full SPIN Mode


Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’s Obfuscations are Very Transparent
The Dissemblings are Amateurish Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has been caught in a lie by John D. Negroponte . Attorney General Alberto Gonzales Is digging in deep.

From a SPINNING Karl Rove to a terrified Harriet Miers backed up against a fixable-truth what-ever you say Joshua B. Bolten. Both soon to be found in contempt of congress and invited on a hot double date with the truth. Don’t worry some day Rep. Henry A. Waxman and Sen.Patrick J. Leahy will have answers to some very simple questions like.. which is more important in the DOJ, law enforcement or political cronyism? Why were the “Gonzales Eight” targeted for termination by the HIT MAN Attorney General Alberto Gonzales?? was Karl Rove really the master mind that was smacked down by the “Gonzales Eight” when they started acting like law enforcement officials applying the law with out considerations given to party affiliation??. Allowing no protection for the The F.O.G. Elite and the K Street Project boys . These out of control prosecutor’s attitude of busting anybody who violates the law had to stop..( it was bad for business). Will Sen.Patrick J. Leahy andRep. Henry A. Waxman smack down George Walker Bush’s Executive Privilege arguments and force a reckoning of all SPIN against the truth. Sen.Patrick J. Leahy will be the hard place and Rep. Henry A. Waxman is the rock,,,have a nice day Bush .

By Kenneth B Jackson Jr

RNC PARAGONS OF VIRTUE

July 21st, 2007

Posted 7/21/07 4:19 AM

Sen. David Vitter Another SADISTIC NE-CON EVANGELICAL ACTIVISTS Outed for What He Really Is …..

A John in Heat

Sen. David Vitter is another poster child for GOP Family Values the true underpinnings of the NECON revolution.

By Kenneth B Jackson Jr

Stop The RNC/CATO Lies

July 17th, 2007

Let Us Cut Through The RNC /Cato/Heritage Alliance Lies
About Social Security And FDR



THE INITIAL TEN YEAR PERIOD WAS TO BE THE RAMP UP TO A PRE-FUNDED SYSTEM.




CLICK CHART and scroll down about one inch !



C. Payroll Tax Freeze, 1942-1947

Between 1942 and 1947, the Social Security payroll tax rate increase
was postponed seven times. It was not until 1950 that the 1% Social Security
tax rate was allowed to rise to 1.5%.

1. The Revenue Act of 1942, P.L. 753 (H.R. 7378, 77th Congress) was signed
by President Roosevelt on October 21, 1942. It provided that for calendar
year 1943, the payroll tax rate for old-age and survivors benefits would
be frozen at the existing rate of 1% for employees and employers, each,
instead of being increased to 2% on each as otherwise would have been
required.

2. P.L. 211, (H.J. Res. 171, 78th Congress), a joint resolution regarding
the Tariff Act, signed by President Roosevelt on December 22, 1943, froze
the payroll tax at the 1% rate until March 1, 1944. The purpose of the
resolution was to give Congress time to consider the scheduled payroll
tax increase before it went into effect.

3. The Revenue Act of 1943, P.L. 235 (H.R. 3687, 78th Congress), was vetoed by President Roosevelt on February 22, 1944; the veto was overridden by the House on February 24, 1944 and by the Senate on February 25, 1944. The bill deferred the scheduled payroll tax increase (from 1 to 2%) until 1945.

P.L. 235 also contained an amendment by Senator Murray (D-MT) that authorized
the use of general revenues if payroll taxes were insufficient to meet
Social Security benefit obligations. Senator Murray stated that the amendment
merely stated in law what had been implied in the Senate Committee report.
Senator Vandenberg (R-MI) replied that the amendment “has no immediate
application, it has no immediate menace, it contemplates and anticipates
no immediate appropriation; but as the statement of a principle, I agree
with the amendment completely.”(46) The
amendment passed by voice vote.(47) The
“Murray-Vandenberg” general revenue provision was repealed in 1950, when
the tax rate was increased.

4. The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) of 1945, P.L. 495 (H.R.
5564, 78th Congress), signed by President Rooseve1t on December 16, 1944,
froze the payroll tax rate at 1% until 1946 and scheduled the payroll
tax rate to rise to 2.5% for the years 1946 through 1948, and to 3% thereafter.

5. The Revenue Act of 1945, P.L. 214 (H.R. 4309, 79th Congress), signed
by President Truman on November 8, 1945, deferred the tax rate increase
until 1947.

6. The Social Security Amendments of 1946, P.L. 719 (H.R. 7037, 79th
Congress), signed by President Truman on August 10, 1946, deferred the
tax rate increase until 1948.

7. The Social Security Amendments of 1947, P.L. 379 (H.R. 3818, 80th
Congress), signed by President Truman on August 6, 1947, continued the
freeze on the tax rate increase until 1950 and provided that it would
rise to 1.5% for 1950-51 and to 2% thereafter.

Members who favored these payroll tax freezes argued that the Social Security reserves were adequate and that benefit payments in the immediate future could be met with the current payroll tax rate. In a 1942 letter to the Senate Finance Committee, President Roosevelt said that “a failure to allow the scheduled increase in rates to take place under the present favorable circumstances would cause a real and justifiable fear that adequate funds will not be accumulated to meet the heavy obligations of the future and that the claims for benefits accruing under the present law may be jeopardized.” He also stated that “expanded Social Security, together with other fiscal measures, would set up a bulwark of economic security for the people now and after the war and at the same time would provide anti-inflationary sources for financing the war.”
(48)
Members who were opposed to
the freeze argued that the scheduled payroll tax increase was important
for the long-term soundness of the OASI trust fund and that postponing
the tax increase would mean higher payroll tax rates in the future and
perhaps Government subsidies to meet obligations. Some proponents of the
freeze maintained that the Administration wanted the tax increase to retire
the public debt accumulated by wartime expenditures.

Although Senator Vandenberg (R-MI) was the main spokesman for postponing
the payroll tax increases, the legislative effort to defer tax increases
was bipartisan. “Without regard to party or ideology, elected representatives
of the people were not willing to argue for increases in an earmarked
tax if a current need for them could not be demonstrated,” one scholar
has observed.(49)

By Kenneth B Jackson Jr